Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 general score. Galaxy Note4 is an incredibly older device than Honor Magic3 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Honor Magic3 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Honor Magic3 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs. Honor Magic3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.