Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 72.8. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is older than the Honor Magic3 Pro, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a way more megapixels camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory. Honor Magic3 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.