Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro's global score of 72.8. Galaxy S10's body is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy S10 has just a bit better display than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a bit higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S10. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a way tinier sensor and a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.