Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than the Honor Magic3 Pro, with a global score of 94.8 against 72.8. The Galaxy S20 design is a lot lighter and thinner than Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 17 months before. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better number of pixels in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 features a CPU that is just as good as Honor Magic3 Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy S20 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 takes slightly better videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images and a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.