Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro, with a 98 score against 72.8. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little heavier phone than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's CPU is just as good as the processor in Honor Magic3 Pro, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a quite bigger screen and a quite better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a 9% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.