Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's global score of 72.8. The Galaxy S22 construction is thinner and extremely lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, even though they were only released 7 months apart. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy S22. They have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 counts with a better looking screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 24% more battery size. Galaxy S22 has a lot better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, and although they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.