Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Honor Magic3 Pro, but it's a bit heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple additional features.
The Honor Magic3 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot more megapixels back camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Honor Magic3 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.