Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 score. Galaxy S7 is an much older cellphone than Honor Magic3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S7 has a brighter display than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Honor Magic3 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Honor Magic3 Pro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.