Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the Honor Magic3 Pro, having a global score of 88.5 against 72.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy Z Flip body is thinner and lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it was released a bit more more than a year before.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a CPU that's just as good as the Honor Magic3 Pro one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a just a bit better display density, a little bit larger display and a slightly higher 1344 x 2772 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots clearer photographs and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a back facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy Z Flip has as much memory for games and applications as Honor Magic3 Pro, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.