Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro, with a 94.6 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and incredibly heavier cellphone than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Honor Magic3 Pro has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1344 x 2772 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features as much memory to install applications and games as Honor Magic3 Pro, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Honor Magic3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.