Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a overall score of 87.9 against 72.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a bit heavier device than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but they have the same thickness.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch of screen, a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.