Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black and White | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a score of 87.3, which is better than Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 score. Xiaomi Poco F3 is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter device than the Honor Magic3 Pro, even though both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user identical operating system features.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a bit better display than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a little faster processor than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 shoots much better videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor shooting way worse quality photos and a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.