Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's general score of 72.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design has the same thickness than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera. Honor Magic3 Pro features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better battery duration than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.