Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is just a bit better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 score. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with very similar OS features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a a bit lighter device than Honor Magic3 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772, a just a little higher pixels density and a bit larger screen. Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.