Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the Honor Magic6 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 76.6. The Galaxy Note9 is a lighter device than Honor Magic6 Pro, but both are 0.35inches thick. Galaxy Note9 features a bit sharper display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel number per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. Honor Magic6 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a back facing camera with way more MP, a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.