Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 general score. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's design is much newer than the Google Nexus 6P's, although it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a quite superior performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 2800, it also counts with a larger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way more mega pixels back camera, a way bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.