Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 global score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design is a lot newer than Google Pixel 2's, although it's thicker and heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a much bigger display, a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution and a bit greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way larger aperture, a lot larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a back camera with a much higher resolution and higher video frame rate.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.