Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-22 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black and White |
| Glass and Titanium | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is better than the Galaxy A8 Star's general score of 82.1. Even though Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is notably newer than Galaxy A8 Star, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the previous 14 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a little bigger display and a better 1280 x 2800 resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a little better performance than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 18 GB more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a camera with much more megapixels, a larger camera aperture for better photos in low-light situations and better video frame rates.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.