Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-03-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Titanium | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a 92.1 score against 81. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's design is way newer, but extremely thicker and much heavier than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has older 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit greater display pixels density, a little larger screen and a better 1280 x 2800px resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 18 GB more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a lot larger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.