Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black and White |
| Glass and Titanium | -- |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 92.1 score against 77.8. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these phones have the same Android 14 operating system. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features just a bit better screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density and a little bit brighter display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger sensor.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 512 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.