Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-22 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Titanium | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1389.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 23.2 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is slightly better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a 92.1 score against 85.5. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a extremely heavier phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but both are 0.35inches thick. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a better 1280 x 2800 resolution, a quite better quantity of pixels in each display inch, a lot brighter screen and a quite larger display. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot larger sensor and a much larger aperture.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.