Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-03-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Agate Grey and Frozen Berry | Black and White |
| Glass and Titanium | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 24 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 1 TB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 23.2 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 92.1 score against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Even being the best we compare here, we must note that it is also a a bit heavier and much thicker cellphone.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a little more vivid screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little brighter display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, because it has a 2% larger battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a 50 megapixels resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.