Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-08-09 | 2018-08-29 |
| 7.04 x 3.58 x 0.28 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 420.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 445 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 955 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is way better than the Honor Note 8's 65.5 score. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is thicker than the Honor Note 8, it's lighter and also noticeably newer. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better looking display than Honor Note 8, although it has a quite worse pixels density, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a quite smaller display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Honor Note 8, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better hardware performance than Honor Note 8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot better camera than Honor Note 8, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot higher video definition. Honor Note 8 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.