Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-01-22 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is way better than Honor View20's general score of 73.2. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy A90 5G's body is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the Honor View20. The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Honor View20, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A90 5G features a screen that's just as good as Honor View20's display, because although the Galaxy A90 5G has a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen. The Honor View20 and the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G both count with very similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images, they both have the same video quality, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates and a same size back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor View20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Honor View20, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.