Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-01-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the Honor View20's 73.2 general score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy C9 Pro is older and just a little bit heavier than the Honor View20, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. The Honor View20 features a little bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2310px.
The Honor View20 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor View20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Honor View20 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture for better low light images, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Honor View20 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy C9 Pro and Honor View20 both feature extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.