Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 overall score. Google Nexus 6P's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Honor View30 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Honor View30 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a bit more vivid screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixels density. Honor View30 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Google Nexus 6P's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Honor View30 Pro one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. Honor View30 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 19 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.