Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, with a global score of 81.6 against 74.6. Google Pixel 2's body is thinner and way lighter than the Honor View30 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly better display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixels density.
The Honor View30 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor View30 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Honor View30 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Honor View30 Pro, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Honor View30 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.