Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 74.6. Although Google Pixel XL is much older than Honor View30 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Honor View30 Pro has a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel XL features a bit sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Google Pixel XL has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as Honor View30 Pro, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
Honor View30 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Honor View30 Pro has better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.