Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Honor View30 Pro, with a global score of 83.7 against 74.6. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Honor View30 Pro, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. These phones use the same Android 10 OS.
LG V50 ThinQ features a CPU that is just as good as the Honor View30 Pro one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Honor View30 Pro captures better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Honor View30 Pro has just a little better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.