Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than Honor View30 Pro, having a global score of 76.4 against 74.6. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version. The Motorola Droid Turbo design is lighter than Honor View30 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released many years before.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Honor View30 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Honor View30 Pro features a better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 40 mega pixels resolution, higher video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
Honor View30 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.