Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's global score of 74.6. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is lighter than Honor View30 Pro, but it's thicker and was released 5 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, counting with some extra features and performance improvements.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Honor View30 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Honor View30 Pro has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory. The Honor View30 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Honor View30 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.