Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 score. Galaxy Note9's construction has the same thickness than Honor View30 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little more vivid display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy Note9 features a processing unit that's very similar to the CPU in Honor View30 Pro, and although the Galaxy Note9 has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor View30 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity. Honor View30 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.