Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a 77.8 score against 74.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit heavier than the Honor View30 Pro, it's noticeably thinner and also notably newer.
Honor View30 Pro features a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger screen and a just a little better pixel count per display inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a more megapixels back facing camera, a way bigger sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 39 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.