Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, having a 78.8 score against 74.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X60 Pro has the newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version. The vivo X60 Pro body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor View30 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2376px resolution and a bit worse pixel density, they both have a screen of the same size. The vivo X60 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 0.5 inches sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.