Compare phones
HP iPAQ 900
900, 910
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 36.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Xiaomi |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | -- |
| 2007-09-05 | 2018-08-29 |
| 4.45 x 2.52 x 0.63 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 160 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1840mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is a lot better than the HP iPAQ 900's 36.4 score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is way newer and extremely thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HP iPAQ 900. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior processing power than HP iPAQ 900, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 7,88 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much sharper screen than HP iPAQ 900, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2246 resolution, a way larger display and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HP iPAQ 900. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way better battery lifetime than HP iPAQ 900, because it has a 117% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a lot better photographs and videos than HP iPAQ 900, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little more expensive than the HP iPAQ 900, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.