Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2016-05-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the HTC 10, with a global score of 85 against 75.7. The iPhone 8 design is newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the HTC 10. The HTC 10 has a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a little bigger display and a lot better screen pixels density.
IPhone 8 counts with a better performing processing unit than HTC 10, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The HTC 10 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the HTC 10 also has faster 120 frames per second video frame rate and a way larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
The iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. HTC 10 features a much longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 65 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC 10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC 10, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.