Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is much better than HTC 10's 75.7 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than HTC 10's, although it is also heavier. HTC 10 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores and less RAM.
The HTC 10 and the Motorola Edge 40 Pro have similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much worse screen density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a larger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery life than HTC 10, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better camera than HTC 10, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.