Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a bit better than HTC 10's general score of 75.7. Moto G Stylus's body is notably newer than the HTC 10's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC 10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has more processing cores.
HTC 10 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. Moto G Stylus captures better videos and photos than HTC 10, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Moto G Stylus features a greater storage for apps and games than HTC 10, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features improved battery performance than HTC 10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus and the HTC 10 cost exactly the same, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.