Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than HTC 10, with a general score of 83.3 against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy M30s is a heavier phone than HTC 10, but both have the same thickness. HTC 10 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The HTC 10 counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M30s has a bit faster processor than HTC 10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy M30s also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a much longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a slightly better camera than HTC 10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.