Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the HTC 10's 75.7 global score. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a extremely newer device than the HTC 10, but it's notably heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than HTC 10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater number of faster cores.
HTC 10 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. HTC 10 has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC 10 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations and a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a much larger sensor.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro is way more expensive than HTC 10, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.