Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-09-26 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.12 x 2.58 x 0.46 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.8 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is a little bit better than the HTC Amaze 4G, with a overall score of 64.8 against 59.8. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version while HTC Amaze 4G has Android 4.0, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance improvements. The Nokia 3.1 A is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than the HTC Amaze 4G.
HTC Amaze 4G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a way smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 960 x 540px and a little bit worse pixel quantity per display inch. The Nokia 3.1 A has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC Amaze 4G, because it has 16 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Nokia 3.1 A features just a little better hardware performance than HTC Amaze 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia 3.1 A captures better photos and videos than HTC Amaze 4G. Both of them have the same video frame rates, a camera with an 8 mega-pixels and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a much longer battery performance than HTC Amaze 4G, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 A is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.