Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3.4 | Android 4.2 |
| 2011-09-26 | 2014-03-15 |
| 5.12 x 2.58 x 0.46 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| S-LCD | TFT |
| 256 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | -- |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S3 Slim is just a bit better than the HTC Amaze 4G, having a general score of 60.4 against 59.8. The Galaxy S3 Slim construction is a lot newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than HTC Amaze 4G. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S3 Slim has newer 4.2 version and HTC Amaze 4G has Android 4.0, so it counts with a lot of extra features and better performance.
HTC Amaze 4G features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 1 GB RAM, the HTC Amaze 4G also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S3 Slim has a bit better looking screen than HTC Amaze 4G, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 960 x 540px, the Galaxy S3 Slim also counts with a quite larger display.
The HTC Amaze 4G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the HTC Amaze 4G also has a back camera with way more mega pixels. The HTC Amaze 4G counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 32 GB, the HTC Amaze 4G also has 16 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has longer battery duration than HTC Amaze 4G, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S3 Slim not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.