Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.3 | 53 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Windows Phone 7.5 Mango | Android 4.0 |
| 2011-02-24 | 2014-01-27 |
| 4.63 x 2.32 x 0.61 inches | 5.50 x 2.74 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 4.44 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 220.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 259 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1400 MHz processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.29 | 7.83 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 1.76 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 1.20 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.6 | 2.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1820mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 27 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus PadFone E is just a bit better than the HTC Arrive, with a score of 53 against 48.3. Asus PadFone E counts with Android 4.0 OS, while HTC Arrive works with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango OS. Asus PadFone E's body is incredibly newer, thinner and a lot lighter than HTC Arrive. The Asus PadFone E features a bit superior processor than HTC Arrive, although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, they both have 1 CPU cores.
Asus PadFone E features a bit better looking screen than HTC Arrive, because it has a way larger display, a lot higher 1280 x 720 resolution and a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen. Asus PadFone E counts with a very superior camera than HTC Arrive, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1280x720 video resolution, the Asus PadFone E also has a lot more MP back facing camera.
The HTC Arrive counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Asus PadFone E, although it has no slot for an external memory card. Asus PadFone E features greater battery lifetime than HTC Arrive, because it has a 1820mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Asus PadFone E is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.