Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than HTC Bolt's 75 general score. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than HTC Bolt, it's notably thinner and also much newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than HTC Bolt, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger display and a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
HTC Bolt features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than HTC Bolt, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC Bolt, because it has a 78% larger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than HTC Bolt, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a much better resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.