Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 71.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4, 4.3, 4.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.78 x 0.42 inches | 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 175.00 | $ 145.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 544 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X is slightly better than HTC Butterfly S, getting a general score of 71.8 against 66.2. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC Butterfly S has Android 4.4 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X is a a little heavier but much thinner device than HTC Butterfly S.
HTC Butterfly S has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the HTC Butterfly S also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Butterfly S, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC Butterfly S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC Butterfly S, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X takes greater videos and photos than HTC Butterfly S, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same video frame rate and a F2 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.