Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is better than HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 global score. IPhone 8 is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit thinner and lighter than HTC Desire 10 pro. IPhone 8 has just a bit better screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, a quite smaller display and a bit less pixels per inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a quite superior hardware performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 8 has a better camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor and a way less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The HTC Desire 10 pro features more memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The HTC Desire 10 pro has a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 65% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.