Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than the HTC Desire 10 pro, having a general score of 81.9 against 74.3. The Google Pixel 4 construction is a lot newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little thicker than HTC Desire 10 pro. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280px, a little bit larger display and a just a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The HTC Desire 10 pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC Desire 10 pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a superior camera than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs and a way less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos. HTC Desire 10 pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.