Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.19 x 2.61 x 0.40 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 34.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the HTC Desire 300, having an 81.3 score against 53.7. LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly heavier but notably thinner cellphone than HTC Desire 300. LG V35 ThinQ features a much faster processing unit than HTC Desire 300, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than HTC Desire 300, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880px resolution, a lot greater display pixel density and a way bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than HTC Desire 300, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than HTC Desire 300, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than HTC Desire 300, because it has a camera with a much better 16 MP resolution and a way bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the HTC Desire 300, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.