Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.04 x 2.63 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than HTC Desire 400, with a global score of 81.3 against 55.1. LG V35 ThinQ is a extremely heavier but thinner phone than HTC Desire 400. LG V35 ThinQ has a much sharper display than HTC Desire 400, because it has a way bigger display, a lot greater pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much faster CPU than HTC Desire 400, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Desire 400, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better camera than HTC Desire 400, because it has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than HTC Desire 400, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 1800mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the HTC Desire 400, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.