Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.04 x 2.63 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than the HTC Desire 400's 55.1 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while HTC Desire 400 has Android 4.1.1, so it counts with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy Note 3 is a a little thinner but a lot heavier cellphone than the HTC Desire 400.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant screen than HTC Desire 400, because it has a much bigger screen, a much greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy Note 3 has a way better performance than HTC Desire 400, because it has an extra GPU, a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a way better camera than HTC Desire 400, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC Desire 400, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 3 has a really longer battery performance than HTC Desire 400, because it has a 78 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the HTC Desire 400, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.